NASJE: National Association of State Judicial Educators


Newsletter
 · Current Issue
 · Archive
General Administration
 · Annual Conference
 · Board
 · Bylaws: DOC | PDF
 · Core Comps: DOC | PDF
 · Committees
 · Job Openings
 · Join NASJE
 · Policy & Procedures
 · Strategic Plan
 · Principles & Standards
Regional Info & Resources
 · Midwestern Region
 · Western Region
 · Southeastern Region
 · Northeastern Region
General Interest

 · OUR SPONSORS
 · Emerging Trends
 · Maryland Judiciary's
   Executive Leadership
   Program
 · Contact NASJE
 · NASJE Listserv
 · DUI Resource Library
 · Hardcore Drunk Driving
 · JERITT Home
 · JERITT Communications
 · Links
 · Help

 
Index | News | Resources | Conference Recap | Features | Manager's Briefcase | Comments?

Conference Recap
Welcoming Remarks
Judicial Branch Education
Observations on the Role of the Judicial Educator
Which Level of Evaluation is Right for You?
Experiential Learning
Experiential Learning in the Garden
Where We Were, Where We Are & Where We're Going
Making the Most of Teachable Moments
How to Host and Provide Learning Experiences for International Visitors
Regional Reports

Conference Recap
Judicial Branch Education: Past Revealed, Future Exposed

Presented by Hon. Scott Brownell, Circuit Judge, 12th Judicial Circuit, Bradenton, Florida

The Learning Objectives for this brief presentation were:
a) Recognize what judicial branch education has meant from a judicial perspective and
b) Discuss the significance of judicial branch education in developing the highly developed judge.

The participants were asked first to consider and write, and then to discuss in groups at each table, what their judiciary would have been like without them. In the personal thinking and writing, the goal was to evaluate their judicial education efforts by thinking about a judicial world that had none. This is not a common way to assess what one’s profession has accomplished. Thus, sharing one’s ideas with the group and having the group then report to the class creates a more significant way to “Recognize” the information sought, than by listening to one participant’s opinion. If there is time, the presenter’s opinion is added at the end.

The participants were then given a second task of evaluation. After reviewing Professor Murrell’s qualities of the Highly Developed Judge (HDJ), each class member is asked to identify a judge (or some judges) who possess one of the six qualities identified by Professor Murrell. Each was then asked to evaluate what he or she and the team they work with has done to foster or support that HDJ quality for that judge. This was repeated for one or two additional qualities of the Highly Developed Judge. The individuals again shared their findings with others in their group, and then with the class.


Return to Top