back to search...

NASJE Curriculum Design - Governance Entry Level - Faculty Resources

National Association of State Judicial Educators (NASJE)

Notes:
Governance Entry-Level Faculty Resource One Model of Judicial Branch Education Governance

Description:

1.1.2.1 One Model of Judicial Branch Education Governance

Purpose of resource/document

This resource outlines a potential generalized governance environment for judicial branch education.  The administrative governance entity exercises authority, the stakeholder-based governance entity exercises influence over educational processes and products, and judicial branch education personnel 
work with both types of governance by informing and educating individuals involved and by implementing processes and procedures resulting from both entities.  Stakeholder-based governance is shown in several layers of responsibility.  Depending on the specifics of a local judicial branch education department, these levels may be applicable in varying degrees.

Use of resource/document

This resource could be one of two resources for introducing the concept of blended governance in judicial branch education [see B, Dynamics of Blended Governance in Judicial Branch Education, pg. 10 in the curriculum design].  The other resource, 1.1.2.2 Sources of Governance in Judicial Branch Education, pg. 35, summarizes the scope of influence of each type of governance and the responsibilities of judicial branch educators to each.  Faculty may choose either to use these resources together or or one or the other of them.

Related documents or materials

Faculty resources
1.1.2.2 Sources of Governance for Judicial Branch Education, pg. 35

Participant activities
1.1.3.1 Examining Administrative Governance, pg. 55
1.1.3.2 Examining Stakeholder-Based Governance, pg. 57
1.1.3.3 Comparing Roles and Responsibilities in Stakeholder-Based Governance,pg. 59



The Basics of Governance in Judicial Branch Education
One Model of Governance

 

 

 

I
N
F
O
R
M
S

*

E
D
U
C
A
T
E
S

*

I
M
P
L
E
M
E
N
T
S

Administrative Governance

Authority

The highest level of governance that provides the authority to develop and implement judicial branch education.  This group generally provides funding, determines organizational structure, and oversees administration of the judicial branch education effort. This group may be the State Supreme Court, the Administrative Office of the Courts, an association, a university, or other entity.

 

Stakeholder-Based Governance

Policy

An oversight group, generally a committee or board that makes decisions about the overall direction of judicial branch education.  This group adopts standards, makes decisions about whether curriculum, program, and course development models will be implemented.  This group may include representatives from the administrative organization, the target audiences served, justice system partners, and others.

Advisory

A content- and/or process-related group(s). (a) May decide which curriculum model(s) best meets the needs of a target audience(s) and/or may design and adopt a curriculum for implementation.  (b) May represent a content area that spans target audiences and topics, such as fairness.  The committee(s) may make recommendations to the policy-level committee and/or advise planning committees on content.

Planning

A series of committees that develops or applies program and course development models to best meet the needs of the target audience(s).  Each committee may oversee one or more programs, use curriculum designs (if available) to determine which specific topics are to be addressed in courses, and may have responsibility for choosing faculty and ensuring those chosen adhere to the development model(s).

Faculty

Individuals chosen by planning committees and/or judicial branch education personnel who use program and/or course development models to plan courses and deliver content.

Judicial Branch Education Department Personnel

Judicial branch education personnel have responsibility for introducing and educating individuals in governance entities on effective models of curriculum, program, and course development; implementing models adopted; ensuring adherence to adult education principles; educating faculty; serving as the hub for educational offerings; managing funds; and handling logistics for programs and courses.